Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
11th September 2013: The world's gone mad and I'm the only one who knows
13th August 2013: Black is white. Fact. End of.
11th August 2013: Electric cars, not as green as they're painted?
18th June 2013: Wrinklies unite, you have nothing to lose but your walking frames!
17th May 2013: Some actual FACTS about climate change (for a change) from actual scientists ...
10th May 2013: An article about that poison gas, carbon dioxide, and other scientific facts (not) ...
10th May 2013: We need to see past the sex and look at the crimes: is justice being served?
8th May 2013: So, who would you trust to treat your haemorrhoids, Theresa May?
8th May 2013: Why should citizens in the 21st Century fear the law so much?
30th April 2013: What the GOS says today, the rest of the world realises tomorrow ...
30th April 2013: You couldn't make it up, could you? Luckily you don't need to ...
29th April 2013: a vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE, because THE ABOVE are crap ...
28th April 2013: what goes around, comes around?
19th April 2013: everyone's a victim these days ...
10th April 2013: Thatcher is dead; long live Thatcher!
8th April 2013: Poor people are such a nuisance. Just give them loads of money and they'll go away ...
26th March 2013: Censorship is alive and well and coming for you ...
25th March 2013: Just do your job properly, is that too much to ask?
25th March 2013: So, what do you think caused your heterosexuality?
20th March 2013: Feminists - puritans, hypocrites or just plain stupid?
18th March 2013: How Nazi Germany paved the way for modern governance?
13th March 2013: Time we all grew up and lived in the real world ...
12th March 2013: Hindenburg crash mystery solved? - don't you believe it!
6th March 2013: Is this the real GOS?
5th March 2013: All that's wrong with taxes
25th February 2013: The self-seeking MP who is trying to bring Britain down ...
24th February 2013: Why can't newspapers just tell the truth?
22nd February 2013: Trial by jury - a radical proposal
13th February 2013: A little verse for two very old people ...
6th February 2013: It's not us after all, it's worms
6th February 2013: Now here's a powerful argument FOR gay marriage ...
4th February 2013: There's no such thing as equality because we're not all the same ...
28th January 2013: Global Warming isn't over - IT'S HIDING!
25th January 2013: Global Warmers: mad, bad and dangerous to know ...
25th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
19th January 2013: We STILL haven't got our heads straight about gays ...
16th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
11th January 2013: What it's like being English ...
7th January 2013: Bleat, bleat, if it saves the life of just one child ...
7th January 2013: How best to put it? 'Up yours, Argentina'?
7th January 2013: Chucking even more of other people's money around ...
6th January 2013: Chucking other people's money around ...
30th December 2012: The BBC is just crap, basically ...
30th December 2012: We mourn the passing of a genuine Grumpy Old Sod ...
30th December 2012: How an official body sets out to ruin Christmas ...
16th December 2012: Why should we pardon Alan Turing when he did nothing wrong?
15th December 2012: When will social workers face up to their REAL responsibility?
15th December 2012: Unfair trading by a firm in Bognor Regis ...
14th December 2012: Now the company that sells your data is pretending to act as watchdog ...
7th December 2012: There's a war between cars and bikes, apparently, and  most of us never noticed!
26th November 2012: The bottom line - social workers are just plain stupid ...
20th November 2012: So, David Eyke was right all along, then?
15th November 2012: MPs don't mind dishing it out, but when it's them in the firing line ...
14th November 2012: The BBC has a policy, it seems, about which truths it wants to tell ...
12th November 2012: Big Brother, coming to a school near you ...
9th November 2012: Yet another celebrity who thinks, like Jimmy Saville, that he can behave just as he likes because he's famous ...
5th November 2012: Whose roads are they, anyway? After all, we paid for them ...
7th May 2012: How politicians could end droughts at a stroke if they chose ...
6th May 2012: The BBC, still determined to keep us in a fog of ignorance ...
2nd May 2012: A sense of proportion lacking?
24th April 2012: Told you so, told you so, told you so ...
15th April 2012: Aah, sweet ickle polar bears in danger, aah ...
15th April 2012: An open letter to Anglian Water ...
30th March 2012: Now they want to cure us if we don't believe their lies ...
28th February 2012: Just how useful is a degree? Not very.
27th February 2012: ... so many ways to die ...
15th February 2012: DO go to Jamaica because you definitely WON'T get murdered with a machete. Ms Fox says so ...
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...


Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net


Older stuff






The GOS reads a lot of crime fiction. His favourite authors at present are Dennis Lehane, Lee Child, Michael Connelly, Ian Rankin, David Lawrence, Reginald Hill and Christopher Brookmyre. The trouble with crime fiction – or at least the media assessment of it – is that it is generally judged by people who don't actually read. Or if they do read it, they are too thick to form any kind of rational critical opinion. Or perhaps they just can't be arsed. When Kate Atkinson won the Whitbread Prize for Behind The Scenes At The Museum (not crime fiction, this one), all the newspapers could think of was that she was a single mother. Never mind she could actually write rather well and had been judged by her peers to be the best thing since sliced bread, she had a baby out of wedlock. How fascinating was that? It's very odd that sex is something most of us can do or have done at some time, yet we appear to be obsessed with it. Why is that? Most of us can breathe, but no one writes magazine articles about it.
All too often the media's attitude to crime writers is based not on whether they are worthy, but on whether they are newsworthy. And the public, like the sheep they are, bleat happily along behind. Never mind that Stieg Larsson's Salander books are boring and amateurish (as we'll demonstrate in a moment, if you'll bear with us), they have an unusual protagonist with a great tattoo and nose studs and they come from Sweden which is this cool country most of us couldn't find on a map, so they must be the next big thing and we can't get enough of them. Just as well the author died, really, and couldn't write any more.
Did you notice something about that list of the GOS's favourites? They're all men.
There are plenty of female crime writers, of course, and some are good. But again the media claptrap intrudes – women crime writers are interesting because they're women, not for the value of their writing. Ruth Rendell of Inspector Wexford fame is often described as The Queen of Crime Fiction, but her books don't bear out such an exaggerated assessment. We'd tend to compare her to Reginald Hill (Dalziel and Pascoe), and she doesn't come out of the comparison too well.
The other “Queen of Crime” is Agatha Christie, and that's an accolade even less deserved. Her writing is shallow and agonisingly boring, and her plots, such as they are, trite, contrived and illogical. Dorothy Sayers a different kettle of fish; her Nine Tailors is a masterpiece, and the descriptions of the landscape and the church bells, the Nine Tailors themselves, bawling out across the fens, are incredibly evocative. The plot's not bad, either, and the depth of technical knowledge quite awe-inspiring – if you can follow it. But at the end of the day her books are fascinating more as period pieces and technical exercises than as real pulp fiction crime novels, and they aren't at all easy to read either. Most of us don't look to crime fiction for great literature.
There are really good female crime writers, of course. We would single out the afore-mentioned Kate Atkinson for her Jackson Brodie books, including the intriguingly-titled Started early, took my dog. Val McDermid's Wire in the Blood series is also very good, but the more you read them, the more formulaic they become. Mind you, Haydn wrote 104 symphonies all to the same formula. Mozart used pretty much the same formula. A formula's not necessarily a bad thing if it's a good one. The same can be said of Patricia Cornwell's Kay Scarpetta novels. Sara Paretsky's Warshawski books are better.
Anyway, enough of this outrageous generalisation. This current vogue for Scandinavian crime novels has really got our fictional goat. The telly's full of it, and it's true that both enormously long series of The Killing were pretty compulsive viewing, and Sarah Lund was a strangely attractive heroine for a plain girl who wears woolly sweaters and never smiles. The French equivalent, Spiral, was much better, grittily Parisian. But this was television, not books. The Killing is being turned into novels, by David Hewson, but it started life as television so we don't think it counts.
No, the real criminals here are bloody Stieg Larsson and bloody Henning Mankell, who are on everyone's lips and don't deserve a fraction of the attention they've enjoyed. To be perfectly blunt, when you put their books alongside those of Ian Rankin or David Lawrence, they really aren't much good.
Henning Mankell's character Wallender is intensely annoying. The author attempts to make him seem real by making him moan constantly about how unwell he feels and how hard he is working - but he scarcely ever seems to do any work. A meeting in the morning and interviewing a suspect in the afternoon is a good day's work for Wallender. He eats nothing but sandwiches and coffee (as do most of the characters in Stieg Larsson), and has a habit of asking himself really stupid questions - “I really must catch this murderer ... but how am I going to do it? God, I feel tired. I really must not work so hard. What I need is some coffee and a sandwich, but where am I going to get them?”
Far less well known are the Martin Beck novels by the husband and wife writing team of Sjöwall and Wahlöo. The GOS has only read a couple of these earlier books, but got the impression that Mankell had read them and absorbed them thoroughly, because they have many of the same annoying characteristics.
And so to Stieg Larsson. The GOS has just ploughed through all three of his Salander novels, The girl with the dragon tattoo, The girl who played with fire and The girl who kicked the hornets' nest. By the time he got a third of the way through the last one it was perfectly obvious how it was going to end, and it did. The GOS plodded on more out of a sense of duty than anything else, and was dreadfully bored.
There are dozens and dozens of characters, most of them called Andersson, which is confusing. However, by the time you realise you don't know who half these people are, you've lost interest in the whole thing so it doesn't matter. Larsson tries to make all these characters “live” by describing them, but as his descriptions usually go “she was wearing black trousers, a pink blouse and a leather three-quarter-length coat” it isn't all that effective.
Whenever a new character appears we are treated to a biography ... “as she left the building, a man brushed past her. He wore blue jeans, a white shirt and a dark jacket. He had been born in 1979 in Stockholm and studied in London, leaving with a second-class degree in engineering. He worked for a major car manufacturer in the quality control division. He was married but separated, and his three children aged 5,7 and 10 lived with their mother. She never saw him again and he has no bearing on this story whatsoever”.
The main character, the journalist Blomkvist, is a bit of a wuss but strangely attractive to women, who tend to fall into his bed without any provocation from him. Perhaps that's what happens in Sweden. The other main character, Lisbeth Salander, is rather more interesting. She is the size of a small child but makes up for it by being magnificently violent. She is sexually promiscuous when the mood takes her, but relates badly to other human beings – in fact, she hardly relates to them at all so how she manages to get them into bed is hard to tell. She is immensely rich and a genius, with awesome computer skills, a photographic memory and enormous intelligence that enables her to read abstruse scientific texts for fun and solve Fermat's Theorem in her head. While having a fight. She buys a magnificent million-pound apartment in the most prestigious part of Stockholm, and furnishes it entirely from the Ikea catalogue, all her choices being recounted in tedious detail. You know, the kind of character you can really relate to.
Larsson's powers of description are, frankly, laughable: “The man went straight down into the tunnelbana station at Birger Jarlsgaten and bought a ticket at the gate. He waited on the southbound platform – the direction Salander was going anyway – and got on the Norsborg train. He got off at Slussen, changed to the green line towards Farsta, and got off again at Skanstull. From there he walked to Blomberg's Café on Götgaten.” (from The girl who played with fire).
Riveting stuff, eh? It's as though you were really there. Not.
Compare it to a passage from Dennis Lehane's Moonlight Mile ... “Kestle Cars & Repair sat across from a Burger King in the part of my neighborhood the locals call Ho Chi Minh Trail, a seven-block section of Dorchester Avenue where waves of Vietnamese, Cambodian and Laotian immigrants settled. There were six cars on the lot, all in dubious condition, all with 'Make an offer' painted in yellow on their windshields. The garage bay doors were closed and the lights were off, but we could hear a loud chatter from the back. There was a dark green door to the left of the bay doors.”
Larsson again, this time introducing a major character ... “Dragan Armansky was born in Croatia fifty-six years ago. His father was an Armenian Jew from Belorussia. His mother was a Bosnian Muslim of Greek extraction. She had taken charge of his upbringing and his education, which meant as an adult he was lumped together with that large, heterogeous group defined by the media as Muslims. The Swedish immigration authorities had registered him, strangely enough, as a Serb. His passport confirmed that he was a Swedish citizen, and his passport photograph showed a squarish face, a strong jaw, five-o'clock shadow and greying temples.” (from The girl with the dragon tattoo).
And Lehane again ... “The fourth guy sat slightly to our right, behind the desk. He had dark hair. His skin was covered in a sheen of sweat, fresh droplets popping through the pores as we watched. He was about thirty-going-on-a-coronary. And you could smell the crank singeing his veins from Newfoundland. His left knee jackhammered under the desk. His right hand patted a steady bongo beat on the top. My laptop sat in front of him. He stared at us with bright eyes pinned to the rear wall of his skull.”
And before anyone writes indignantly that it's just a matter of style, and the whole thing's just my opinion, it ain't: writing style needs to be effective and to do its job. Lehane's prose is annoyingly American, a tough-talking successor to Philip Marlowe, but it does the job of putting you right in the middle of the action: you don't know what size collar the dark-haired man takes or where he was born and bred, but you definitely know he's a wrong-un, a druggie, and that he's wired up and ready to spring. What do you know about Dragan Arminsky, apart from a few dull facts about his ancestry? Is he good or bad? How is he feeling? Do we need to be wary of him or not? OK, it's a question of style: in Lehane's case it's a style very much based on the grand, well-tried tradition of American detective fiction. In Larsson's it's just amateurish.
As for the tunnelbana journey ... well, it's a map, nothing more. We might be in any major city in the world, apart from the Swedish-sounding station names. What does the train look like? Is it old or new? Does it make a particular noise? What about the other passengers? Is it crowded or not? Is Skanstull the sort of place we'd like to find ourselves? Would we frequent Blomberg's, or is it a greasy spoon? Tell us something, for God's sake!
Lehane, on the other hand, paints a picture with a minimum of brush strokes, using a few little details to conjure up a picture we can all recognise. I think I used to have my car serviced at Kestle's in the sixties, only it was in Tottenham then.
It's all just fashion, and trends, and vogues and fads, really. It has little to do with quality or worth, and fär mörë tö dö with fëëling cööl änd intelligënt bëcäüsë wë rëäd bööks with löäds of ümläuts in.

Grumpy Old - homepage

Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.








Copyright © 2011 The GOS
Grumpy Old - homepage


Captain Grumpy's
- some older posts

ID cards
Old folk
Hairy man
The church
The Pope