Grumpy Old Sod Dot Com - an internet voice for the exasperated. Sick of the nanny state? Pissed off with politicians? Annoyed by newspapers? Irate with the internet? Tell us about it!

Send us an email
Go back
11th September 2013: The world's gone mad and I'm the only one who knows
13th August 2013: Black is white. Fact. End of.
11th August 2013: Electric cars, not as green as they're painted?
18th June 2013: Wrinklies unite, you have nothing to lose but your walking frames!
17th May 2013: Some actual FACTS about climate change (for a change) from actual scientists ...
10th May 2013: An article about that poison gas, carbon dioxide, and other scientific facts (not) ...
10th May 2013: We need to see past the sex and look at the crimes: is justice being served?
8th May 2013: So, who would you trust to treat your haemorrhoids, Theresa May?
8th May 2013: Why should citizens in the 21st Century fear the law so much?
30th April 2013: What the GOS says today, the rest of the world realises tomorrow ...
30th April 2013: You couldn't make it up, could you? Luckily you don't need to ...
29th April 2013: a vote for NONE OF THE ABOVE, because THE ABOVE are crap ...
28th April 2013: what goes around, comes around?
19th April 2013: everyone's a victim these days ...
10th April 2013: Thatcher is dead; long live Thatcher!
8th April 2013: Poor people are such a nuisance. Just give them loads of money and they'll go away ...
26th March 2013: Censorship is alive and well and coming for you ...
25th March 2013: Just do your job properly, is that too much to ask?
25th March 2013: So, what do you think caused your heterosexuality?
20th March 2013: Feminists - puritans, hypocrites or just plain stupid?
18th March 2013: How Nazi Germany paved the way for modern governance?
13th March 2013: Time we all grew up and lived in the real world ...
12th March 2013: Hindenburg crash mystery solved? - don't you believe it!
6th March 2013: Is this the real GOS?
5th March 2013: All that's wrong with taxes
25th February 2013: The self-seeking MP who is trying to bring Britain down ...
24th February 2013: Why can't newspapers just tell the truth?
22nd February 2013: Trial by jury - a radical proposal
13th February 2013: A little verse for two very old people ...
6th February 2013: It's not us after all, it's worms
6th February 2013: Now here's a powerful argument FOR gay marriage ...
4th February 2013: There's no such thing as equality because we're not all the same ...
28th January 2013: Global Warming isn't over - IT'S HIDING!
25th January 2013: Global Warmers: mad, bad and dangerous to know ...
25th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
19th January 2013: We STILL haven't got our heads straight about gays ...
16th January 2013: Bullying ego-trippers, not animal lovers ...
11th January 2013: What it's like being English ...
7th January 2013: Bleat, bleat, if it saves the life of just one child ...
7th January 2013: How best to put it? 'Up yours, Argentina'?
7th January 2013: Chucking even more of other people's money around ...
6th January 2013: Chucking other people's money around ...
30th December 2012: The BBC is just crap, basically ...
30th December 2012: We mourn the passing of a genuine Grumpy Old Sod ...
30th December 2012: How an official body sets out to ruin Christmas ...
16th December 2012: Why should we pardon Alan Turing when he did nothing wrong?
15th December 2012: When will social workers face up to their REAL responsibility?
15th December 2012: Unfair trading by a firm in Bognor Regis ...
14th December 2012: Now the company that sells your data is pretending to act as watchdog ...
7th December 2012: There's a war between cars and bikes, apparently, and  most of us never noticed!
26th November 2012: The bottom line - social workers are just plain stupid ...
20th November 2012: So, David Eyke was right all along, then?
15th November 2012: MPs don't mind dishing it out, but when it's them in the firing line ...
14th November 2012: The BBC has a policy, it seems, about which truths it wants to tell ...
12th November 2012: Big Brother, coming to a school near you ...
9th November 2012: Yet another celebrity who thinks, like Jimmy Saville, that he can behave just as he likes because he's famous ...
5th November 2012: Whose roads are they, anyway? After all, we paid for them ...
7th May 2012: How politicians could end droughts at a stroke if they chose ...
6th May 2012: The BBC, still determined to keep us in a fog of ignorance ...
2nd May 2012: A sense of proportion lacking?
24th April 2012: Told you so, told you so, told you so ...
15th April 2012: Aah, sweet ickle polar bears in danger, aah ...
15th April 2012: An open letter to Anglian Water ...
30th March 2012: Now they want to cure us if we don't believe their lies ...
28th February 2012: Just how useful is a degree? Not very.
27th February 2012: ... so many ways to die ...
15th February 2012: DO go to Jamaica because you definitely WON'T get murdered with a machete. Ms Fox says so ...
31st January 2012: We don't make anything any more
27th January 2012: There's always a word for it, they say, and if there isn't we'll invent one
26th January 2012: Literary criticism on GOS? How posh!
12th December 2011: Plain speaking by a scientist about the global warming fraud
9th December 2011: Who trusts scientists? Apart from the BBC, of course?
7th December 2011: All in all, not a good week for British justice ...
9th November 2011: Well what d'you know, the law really IS a bit of an ass ...

 

 
Captain Grumpy's bedtime reading. You can buy them too, if you think you're grumpy enough!
More Grumpy Old Sods on the net

 

 
Older stuff
 

 

 
Both the RAC and the AA have now called for the speed-limit on motorways to be raised to 80 m.p.h. (some motorways, anyway, in good driving conditions). They say that (a) motorways are statistically our safest roads, (b) very many drivers are doing this speed routinely anyway, and (c) police rarely prosecute under 80 m.p.h.
 
Naturally the road safety industry have leapt in heavy-footed already. The rather photogenic Jools Townsend, Campaign and Communications Manager for "Brake" (that's the so-called road safety organisation, rather akin to the Luddites so far as I can see) claimed on television today that research exists showing that an increase to 80 m.p.h. would raise the accident level by 10%.
 
Being too old to fall for the obvious charms of Jools, The Brainless Man's Bimbo, I wondered "What research is that then?" The first place to look was on Brake's own website.
 
Lo and behold, there on the front page was a link called "Research". "Great," I thought, "they wouldn't go public on television without giving details on their website ….. would they?" So I clicked - and, what do you know? - it said "Site under construction". How convenient. I went back and clicked on the link called "Cameras". Also under construction.
 
So come on, lovely Jools, what's this research then? Who has shown that raising a speed limit by 10 m.p.h. increases the accident rate by the same amount? And how did they show it? I can't think of anywhere in the world that has recently raised its speed limits by 10 m.p.h.*, and without doing that, how can you reliably show what it would do to the accident statistics?
 
You're not telling a little porky here, are you, Jools? Not on national television? You didn't just make it all up, safe in the knowledge that if anyone questioned it you could flash back at them "Oh, so you're in favour of killing and maiming old ladies and little children, are you?"
 
Well no, Jools, I'm not. What I'm in favour of is a bit of joined-up thinking on an issue that affects every one of us. Motorways and dual carriageways are statistically safer than ordinary roads (the Brake website says so, so it must be true …. mustn't it?). The national speed-limit on motorways and dual-carriageways is 10 m.p.h. higher than on ordinary roads, yet the accident rate is not 10% greater - quite the opposite. So logically it's not the SPEED that kills, it's the ROADS.
 
But logic's not your strong point, is it, Jools? You prefer the quick sound-bite, the knee-jerk reaction and the catchy slogan. So "Speed kills". It isn't true, but if you keep saying it often enough, people will believe it. I wonder how you sleep at night - do you count speed cameras? Or perhaps it's sheep, like the ones in "Animal Farm", jumping over a fence onto the motorway and bleating "Two legs good, four wheels bad!"
 
How's this for a bit of joined-up thinking? If motorways and dual carriageways are safer, what's the biggest difference between them and ordinary roads? It's the fact that traffic travelling in one direction is separated from traffic travelling the other way. Why can't we do that on ordinary roads?
 
They do in France. Driving in Provence last year I used a stretch of winding road that had tall plastic red-and-white blades standing up down the centre. They wouldn't hurt if you hit one, but they jolly-well stopped you from overtaking anywhere silly. Cheap and effective. Mind you, France is the country where they have variable speed-limits on motorways - one speed in dry conditions, another when the weather's bad. Much too sensible for us, then.

 
* But I do know of a province in Canada that recently removed all its speed cameras. Their statistics showed that people driving 10 m.p.h. below the speed-limit had far more accidents than those driving 10 m.p.h. above. Probably the ones who were speeding were actually watching the road, while those who weren't were admiring the scenery and congratulating themselves on being such safe drivers. But that's in Canada, so I suppose it doesn't count.
 

 
Comments from our visitors
 

 

 

 
Use this Yahoo Search box to find more grumpy places,
either on this site or on the World Wide Web.


 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
Copyright © 2007 The GOS
 
This site created and maintained by PlainSite